Total Economic Impact
Business Benefits And Cost Savings Enabled By The Intuit Platform
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Intuit, JUNE 2025
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Intuit, JUNE 2025
As small and medium-size businesses (SMBs) grow, the constraints of fragmented legacy systems for finance and marketing evolve from minor inconveniences to major business agility inhibitors. To unlock their full potential, SMBs need a unified, automation-driven ecosystem that streamlines core financial and marketing operations. This integrated approach drives productivity gains, reduces costs associated with compliance and outdated legacy tools, and creates new opportunities for revenue growth through improved customer engagement and data-driven decision-making.
The Intuit Platform brings QuickBooks and Mailchimp together to help businesses manage their finances and operations as well as their marketing. With accounting, payroll, payments, bill pay, and marketing all on one platform, businesses can streamline their processes with seamless data flows and effective automation.
Intuit commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying the Intuit Platform.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of the Intuit Platform on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers and surveyed 156 respondents with experience using three or more of the following Intuit products: QuickBooks Payroll, QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Payments, QuickBooks Bill Pay, and Mailchimp.
For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and survey respondents and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a North America-based services firm with $7 million in annual revenue and 14 employees.
Prior to using QuickBooks and Mailchimp products within the Intuit Platform, the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations struggled with a patchwork of disparate tools and manual processes for managing financial reporting, payroll, invoicing, bill payments, and payment processing. Several organizations also relied on basic tools and ad hoc methods to manage and measure email marketing campaigns. This disjointed approach resulted in high administrative overhead, limited visibility into financial operations, and inefficiencies across finance and marketing functions. Manual bookkeeping and reconciliation were error prone and time consuming, while disconnected financial tools required duplicate effort. Marketing resources lacked capabilities for audience segmentation and performance tracking, which limited campaign effectiveness. These limitations ultimately impacted productivity, decision-making, and business growth.
After investing in QuickBooks and Mailchimp products within the Intuit Platform, the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations centralized financial operations and streamlined email marketing through a unified set of tools. Integrating Mailchimp with QuickBooks enabled organizations to link marketing campaigns with real transaction data, which helped teams refine audience targeting, evaluate campaign effectiveness based on actual purchases, and make more informed marketing decisions. Key results from the investment include productivity gains across finance and marketing, cost savings from fewer noncompliance incidents, increased sales from improved customer engagement, and reduced spend on legacy tools. Together, these improvements streamlined operations, strengthened financial and email marketing execution, and gave organizations the agility and insight needed to scale effectively. The combined use of QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Payroll, QuickBooks Payments, QuickBooks Bill Pay, and Mailchimp delivered greater value than the individual tools by creating a more connected, automated, and data-driven environment.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Improved productivity up to 50% on payroll activities with QuickBooks Payroll. QuickBooks Payroll’s payroll management integration, direct deposit processing, tax remittance, and compliance capabilities enable the composite organization to streamline its payroll processes. By automating key functions and consolidating payroll tasks into a single platform, the organization reduces manual data entry, minimizes errors, and eliminates inefficiencies caused by fragmented, third-party tools. Over three years, the composite organization avoids 2,430 hours of payroll activities.
Saved 2,340 hours of financial management activities over three years with QuickBooks Online. By automating key financial activities with QuickBooks Online, the composite organization eliminates inefficiencies in tasks such as invoicing, expense tracking, and reporting. The efficiencies gained enable finance resources to accelerate financial decision-making and focus more on strategic activities like budgeting and forecasting.
Improved productivity up to 60% on bill and vendor payment management with QuickBooks Bill Pay. QuickBooks Bill Pay enables the composite organization to streamline bill and vendor payment management tasks, including entering bills, organizing and tracking payments, securing approvals, and identifying and reconciling fees. By keeping financial data well organized and accessible, the composite reduces the manual burden on finance resources and improves visibility into outstanding obligations to ensure vendors are paid on time.
Saved 1,404 hours of payment processing and financial transaction management activities over three years with QuickBooks Payments. QuickBooks Payments boosts efficiency across invoicing and customer payment workflows. With integrated capabilities for generating invoices, accepting multiple payment types, and automatically syncing transactions to the accounting system, the composite organization reduces manual effort and oversight. Finance resources gain clearer visibility into receivables, act faster on overdue accounts, and keep cash flow steady without relying on fragmented tools or time-consuming reconciliation.
Improved productivity up to 55% on email marketing activities with Mailchimp. Mailchimp increases the effectiveness of the composite’s email marketing. By automating tasks such as scheduling, audience segmentation, and performance tracking, the organization reduces tedious manual work and creates more time for strategy and creativity. With centralized tools and real-time analytics, the composite quickly adapts to live data to refine its approach and ensure messages reach the right audience at the right time.
Saved noncompliance penalty fees of $34,000 over three years. The composite organization eliminates the risk of errors and delays in tax remittances by using QuickBooks Payroll to automate payroll calculations, tax withholdings, and remittance filing. The automation ensures timely, accurate tax payments to mitigate penalty fees associated with missed deadlines or incorrect filings.
Eliminated five vendor late fee instances annually with QuickBooks Bill Pay. The composite organization leverages centralized invoice tracking, automatic payment reminders, and due date notifications through QuickBooks Bill Pay to ensure timely vendor payments and eliminate previously incurred late fees from manual oversight.
Increased sales driven by a 40% improvement in email open rate and a 55% increase in click-through rate with Mailchimp. By using Mailchimp’s segmentation and personalization tools, the composite organization creates highly targeted and relevant email campaigns tailored to customer behavior, demographics, and engagement history. The integration of Mailchimp and QuickBooks allows the composite to connect campaign responses with actual purchase data to provide deeper insights into campaign effectiveness. Using built-in analytics, the organization gains better visibility into performance and can continuously refine marketing strategies, increase engagement, and ultimately achieve higher sales conversion rates.
Saved $21,000 in legacy environment costs over three years. By adopting QuickBooks products and Mailchimp, the composite organization centralizes financial and email marketing operations and eliminates costs associated with outdated, legacy financial and email marketing tools.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Better together value proposition. By centralizing essential business functions within a unified Intuit ecosystem, the composite organization gains greater visibility, efficiency, and control over business operations. The seamless flow of data between Mailchimp and QuickBooks allows the composite to link marketing efforts to actual sales, which fosters tighter coordination between teams and more strategic decision-making that results in better business outcomes.
Improved visibility and decision-making. QuickBooks enhances visibility into essential financial and operational data, enabling the composite organization to make informed business decisions that drive profitability and sustainable growth.
Improved cash flow. The composite organization benefits from better cash flow management by accelerating payment collection and reducing days sales outstanding (DSO) with QuickBooks. With various payment options and automated invoice reminders, customers pay more promptly, which promotes predictable cash flow.
Reduced reliance on manual, third-party bookkeeping. QuickBooks helps the composite organization maintain clean, accurate financial records, which reduces outsourced bookkeeper and CPA effort. Automation streamlines data entry and reconciliation, ultimately cutting time spent on routine prep and review and lowering associated costs.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Fees to Intuit that total $47,000 over three years. The composite organization incurs annual subscription fees for QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Payroll, and Mailchimp based on factors such as plan tier and add-on features. It also pays transaction-based fees for QuickBooks Payments and QuickBooks Bill Pay based on payment volume, payment method (e.g., credit card or ACH), and service options such as expedited processing. Subscription and transaction-based fees increase by 5% annually to reflect anticipated growth in usage, transaction volumes, and advanced feature adoption as the organization scales its operations.
Implementation, training, and ongoing management efforts of $47,000 over three years. The composite organization incurs internal labor costs to support the rollout and use of five Intuit products. Implementation requires approximately 25 hours of internal effort per product. Training is light, with four users spending five hours per product to get up to speed. Ongoing management remains minimal throughout the three-year period, requiring only 20 hours annually per product.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews and survey found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $306,000 over three years versus costs of $94,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $212,000 and an ROI of 227%.
Percentage of all survey respondents who reported that using multiple Intuit products together was more valuable and effective than using individual products from other vendors
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
The interviewees shared their organizations previously had a patchwork of disparate tools and manual processes for financial reporting, payroll, client invoicing, bill payments, and payment processing. Additionally, several organizations relied on basic tools and ad hoc methods to run and measure their marketing campaigns. Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
High administrative overhead due to manual processes. Interviewees consistently highlighted the inefficiencies of manual bookkeeping, reconciliation, and data-entry tasks in their prior environments. These processes were not only time consuming but also led to frequent errors and delays. For example, the CFO at a construction company mentioned that their organization spent up to 16 hours per week managing bill payments and reconciliations manually. The CEO at a healthcare company reported that tracking accounts receivable and invoicing often took up to 20 hours per week.
Fragmented point solutions that led to inefficiencies. Interviewees said that disparate financial management and bookkeeping tools created additional manual effort due to lack of integration and data synchronization. The CFO at a professional services firm shared that their organization previously managed payroll through several unconnected third-party tools, requiring bookkeepers to input information and track changing wages across multiple portals manually. The absence of integration between these tools led to inefficiencies and increased the potential for errors. Similarly, the marketing director at an agriculture company described the cumbersome process of extracting customer data from their legacy system, which lacked integration with their other tools. This manual effort could often take 40 to 50 hours each month, hindering their ability to manage customer information efficiently and leverage it for marketing purposes.
Limited visibility and reporting capabilities that impacted decision-making. Interviewees reported that lack of access to consolidated financial data in real-time made it challenging to generate reports and have visibility into their financial operations and health. This limitation affected their ability to make informed decisions, manage cash flow, and optimize operations. The CFO at a construction company said, “In the past, we would have to wait for the end of the month to reconcile all the bank accounts. This impacted planning around how we could better manage our cash flows.”
Insufficient email marketing capabilities. Interviewees that adopted Mailchimp said that their organizations’ previous environments were significantly limited in their email marketing capabilities. The absence of automated email campaigns, audience segmentation, and engagement tracking hindered their ability to engage customers and prospects effectively to drive sales opportunities. The inability to track and analyze campaign performance further compounded these challenges, making it difficult to refine campaign strategies.
Survey respondents also reported several challenges before investing in QuickBooks products. These issues included integration challenges, excessive technology spend, lack of confidence in payroll tax accuracy, process inefficiencies, and limited analytics and reporting. Additionally, respondents that adopted Mailchimp said that their organizations had previously faced marketing challenges including inefficient processes, insufficient campaign performance metrics, and limited customer segmentation and email targeting.
Base: 156 decision-makers with experience using Intuit products at their organization
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Intuit, January 2025
The interviewees searched for a solution that could:
Streamline financial processes to enhance operational efficiency and mitigate compliance risks.
Centralize payroll and accounting functions to eliminate manual effort, improve data visibility, and increase reporting accuracy.
Automate expense and receivable tracking to improve cash flow management and financial forecasting.
Unify marketing and sales data to create a complete customer profile and capture more business opportunities.
Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite organization is a North America-based services firm with $7 million in annual revenue and 14 employees. The CFO and two bookkeepers manage financial tasks, while the marketing director handles marketing operations. Prior to adopting Intuit products, the composite organization relied on disconnected tools and manual processes for key financial activities such as reporting, payroll, client invoicing, bill payments, and payment processing. These manual processes often introduced noncompliance risks with payroll taxes and vendor payments due to delays, errors, and missed deadlines. Marketing efforts were similarly hindered by basic tools and ad hoc methods for email campaign execution and performance tracking. This fragmented financial ecosystem resulted in inefficiencies, limited visibility, compliance risk, and scalability challenges. To improve operational efficiency, accuracy, and scalability, the organization invests in QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Payroll, QuickBooks Payments, QuickBooks Bill Pay, and Mailchimp.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization deploys QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Payroll, QuickBooks Payments, QuickBooks Bill Pay, and Mailchimp during the initial investment period. Each product requires approximately 25 hours of implementation effort. The CFO and the two bookkeepers are the primary users of QuickBooks Online, Payroll, Payments, and Bill Pay, and the marketing director is responsible for Mailchimp.
$7 million in revenue
14 employees
Four resources using Intuit products (one CFO, two bookkeepers, and one marketing director)
Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atr | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Payroll | $25,272 | $28,431 | $31,590 | $85,293 | $70,205 |
Btr | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Online | $25,272 | $27,378 | $29,484 | $82,134 | $67,753 |
Ctr | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Bill Pay | $15,795 | $17,375 | $18,954 | $52,124 | $42,959 |
Dtr | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Payments | $15,163 | $16,427 | $17,690 | $49,280 | $40,652 |
Etr | Productivity improvement with Mailchimp | $3,645 | $4,050 | $4,455 | $12,150 | $10,008 |
Ftr | Noncompliance penalty fee cost savings from automated tax remittance with QuickBooks Payroll | $13,500 | $13,500 | $13,500 | $40,500 | $33,573 |
Gtr | Vendor late fee cost savings with QuickBooks Bill Pay | $1,125 | $1,125 | $1,125 | $3,375 | $2,798 |
Htr | Increased sales from improved customer engagement with Mailchimp | $6,210 | $6,750 | $7,020 | $19,980 | $16,498 |
Itr | Legacy solution cost savings | $8,100 | $8,505 | $8,931 | $25,536 | $21,102 |
Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $114,082 | $123,540 | $132,749 | $370,372 | $305,548 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents reported that QuickBooks Payroll simplified payroll processes and boosted bookkeeper productivity. With an integrated platform for payroll management and processing, including automated capabilities for direct deposit processing, withholdings, tax remittance, and reporting, the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations could reduce manual, repetitive tasks and pay employees accurately and on time.
The CFO at a professional services company shared that their organization previously managed payroll through several fragmented third-party tools, requiring bookkeepers to input information manually and track labor and changing wages across multiple portals. By adopting QuickBooks Payroll, the organization consolidated payroll activity management into a single platform and leveraged automated payroll processing, direct deposit, reporting, and tax and compliance management capabilities. The consolidation and automation reduced swivel chairing and manual data entry across multiple systems, enhancing overall efficiency.
The CFO at a construction company shared that their organization previously managed payroll efforts manually, leading to inefficiencies and increased chances of errors. As a result, the organization incurred penalties for late tax payments and spent a significant amount of time on manual data entry and reconciliation. By adopting QuickBooks Payroll, the company automated several workflows, including tax remittance, which helped streamline processes, reduce manual work, and effectively eliminate penalties.
In the survey, 70% of respondents whose organizations used QuickBooks reported a reduction in time spent running payroll. On average, respondents reported a 72% decrease in the time required for payroll processing. Additionally, they reported a 32% efficiency gain for compliance management and a 34% reduction in time spent tracking labor costs and job costing.
Average | |
---|---|
Running payroll | 72 |
Direct deposit processing time | 42 |
Compliance management | 33 |
Managing benefits | 22 |
Managing employee docs and data | 22 |
Employee onboarding | 15 |
Tracking labor costs / job costing | 34 |
Base: 53 decision-makers with experience using Intuit products at their organization
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Intuit, January 2025
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite’s finance resources spend 150 hours per month on payroll activities, including processing payroll; tracking labor costs; and managing compliance, benefits, and employee documents and data before adopting QuickBooks Payroll. Over one year, these efforts total 1,800 hours.
With QuickBooks Payroll, the composite organization reduces the time spent on payroll activities by 40% in Year 1, 45% in Year 2, and 50% in Year 3 as users optimize platform use, automate more tasks, and continue to streamline payroll processes using the platform’s capabilities.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a bookkeeping resource is $78.
For this benefit, the composite has a productivity recapture rate of 50%. Resources spend half of the time they save on activities that generate business value, but not all reclaimed time is dedicated to value-added work.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
An organization’s prior tools and processes for payroll activities.
Salaries of resources managing payroll activities.
The degree to which resources recapture time savings toward productive activities.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $70,000.
Productivity improvement for payroll activities by Year 3 with QuickBooks Payroll
Time saved on payroll activities over three years with QuickBooks Payroll
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | Average time spent on payroll activities per month before QuickBooks Payroll (hours) | Composite | 150 | 150 | 150 | |
A2 | Total time spent on payroll activities before QuickBooks Payroll (hours) | A1*12 months | 1,800 | 1,800 | 1,800 | |
A3 | Productivity improvement on payroll activities with QuickBooks Payroll | Interviews and survey | 40% | 45% | 50% | |
A4 | Time saved on payroll activities with QuickBooks Payroll (hours) | A2*A3 | 720 | 810 | 900 | |
A5 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a blended resource that uses QuickBooks Payroll for payroll activities | Composite | $78 | $78 | $78 | |
A6 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
At | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Payroll | A4*A5*A6 | $28,080 | $31,590 | $35,100 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Atr | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Payroll (risk-adjusted) | $25,272 | $28,431 | $31,590 | ||
Three-year total: $85,293 | Three-year present value: $70,205 |
Evidence and data. Before adopting QuickBooks Online, interviewees shared that their organizations struggled with fragmented financial management processes. Disconnected tools and manual workflows for tasks such as invoicing, expense tracking, and financial reporting created inefficiencies, increased the risk of errors, and limited the timeliness and accuracy of financial data. Finance resources often spent significant time reconciling information across systems or manually updating spreadsheets, which delayed reporting and hindered strategic planning activities. With QuickBooks Online, organizations consolidated core accounting and financial management activities into a single, cloud-based platform. Automation capabilities ensured that invoicing, expense tracking, and reporting were faster, more accurate, and easier to manage. This improvement not only reduced the manual workload but also provided real-time visibility into financial performance for improved decision-making.
The CEO at a healthcare company said that QuickBooks Online provided a centralized platform to view financial data and manage activities across the organization’s financial operations, saving the estimated equivalent of one FTE. They shared that the third-party banking system integration enabled their organization to import financial data into the platform automatically, reducing manual data entry and reconciliation efforts. Additionally, with automated features for managing and reconciling invoices, the organization’s bookkeepers saved 20 hours per week on organizing, sending, and tracking invoices.
The CFO at a construction company highlighted that financial reporting became significantly easier. Instead of manually uploading data into spreadsheets to generate reports for management, the interviewee used QuickBooks Online to create custom reports and analyses. They shared that their previous reporting process typically took 8 to12 hours but took less than 1 hour with QuickBooks Online.
In the survey, more than 40% of respondents whose organizations used QuickBooks Online reported time savings for bill payment, payment system reconciliation, charts of accounts management, and customer invoicing.
Average | |
---|---|
Bank feed data matching (paid or received) and bank reconciliations | 57 |
Payment system reconciliations (merchant services) | 61 |
Payroll system reconciliations and journal entries | 48 |
Chart of accounts management | 68 |
Paying bills | 63 |
Invoicing customers | 53 |
Financial reporting | 33 |
Operational reporting | 22 |
Base: 81 decision-makers with experience using Intuit products at their organization
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Intuit, January 2025
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Finance resources at the composite organization spend 100 hours per month on financial management activities, including bank payment system and payroll reconciliations, chart of account management, bill payment, customer invoicing, and reporting before adopting QuickBooks Online. Over one year, these efforts total 1,200 hours.
With QuickBooks Online, the composite organization reduces the time spent on financial management activities by 60% in Year 1, 65% in Year 2, and 70% in Year 3 as users optimize platform use, automate more tasks, and further streamline financial processes.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a resource involved in financial management is $78.
For this benefit, the composite has a productivity recapture rate of 50%. Resources spend half of the time they save on activities that generate business value, but not all reclaimed time is dedicated to value-added work.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
An organization’s prior tools and processes for accounting and financial management.
Salaries of resources using QuickBooks Online.
The degree to which resources recapture time savings toward productive activities.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $68,000.
Productivity improvement on financial management activities by Year 3 with QuickBooks Online
Time saved on financial management activities with QuickBooks Online
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | Average time spent on financial management activities per month before QuickBooks Online (hours) | Composite | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
B2 | Total time spent on financial management activities before QuickBooks Online (hours) | B1*12 months | 1,200 | 1,200 | 1,200 | |
B3 | Productivity improvement on financial management activities with QuickBooks Online | Interviews and survey | 60% | 65% | 70% | |
B4 | Time saved on financial management activities with QuickBooks Online (hours) | B2*B3 | 720 | 780 | 840 | |
B5 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a blended resource that uses QuickBooks Online | A5 | $78 | $78 | $78 | |
B6 | Productivity recapture | Composite | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Bt | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Online | B4*B5*B6 | $28,080 | $30,420 | $32,760 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Btr | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Online (risk-adjusted) | $25,272 | $27,378 | $29,484 | ||
Three-year total: $82,134 | Three-year present value: $67,753 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents reported that QuickBooks Bill Pay played a key role in streamlining their organizations’ bill management and vendor payment processes. By centralizing bill payment activities and enabling automation for recording, scheduling, and paying bills, organizations eliminated the need for manual tracking, payment processing, and reconciliation tasks. Rather than relying on spreadsheets, paper checks, and fragmented workflows, organizations transitioned to a unified platform that ensured timely payments and improved vendor relationships without requiring significant changes to their financial systems. This move helped reduce administrative burden, lower the risk of missed or late payments, and support more efficient, scalable financial operations.
The CFO at a professional services company reported productivity improvements in several activities related to bill payments, including bill processing, recurring payments, and fraud investigation. They estimated reducing the total annual effort required to manage vendor payments from 30 days to five with QuickBooks Bill Pay.
The interviewee also highlighted that QuickBooks Bill Pay enabled their organization to create recurring payments for regular expenses such as rent, ensuring timely payments and reducing the risk of late fees, and they noted this capability saved at least 3 minutes of processing effort per recurring bill. Additionally, the interviewee shared that their organization experienced a significant reduction in check fraud incidents, reducing time previously spent on investigations and resolutions.
The CFO at a construction company reported substantial productivity improvements in bill payment tasks due to QuickBooks Bill Pay. By automating manual processes such as payment scheduling, invoice matching, and vendor notifications, their organization reduced bill pay management time from 16 hours per week to just 3.
In the survey, 61% of respondents that used QuickBooks Bill Pay reported a reduction in time spent entering bills, and 49% indicated a reduction in time spent organizing and tracking bills to be paid. On average, respondents reported a 65% efficiency gain for entering bills and a 57% reduction in time spent organizing and tracking bills to be paid.
Average | |
---|---|
Entering bills | 65 |
Organizing and tracking bills to be paid | 57 |
Approving or getting approval for bills | 41 |
Number of days to pay most bills | 35 |
Reconciling amounts paid per the bank with bills | 41 |
Identifying and reconciling fees for bills paid | 36 |
Base: 49 decision-makers with experience using Intuit products at their organization
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Intuit, January 2025
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Finance resources at the composite organization spend 75 hours per month on bill and vendor payment management activities, including bill entry, organization, tracking, approvals, and reconciliation before adopting QuickBooks Bill Pay. Over one year, these efforts total 900 hours.
With QuickBooks Bill Pay, the composite organization reduces the time spent on bill and vendor payment management activities by 50% in Year 1, 55% in Year 2, and 60% in Year 3 as users optimize platform use, automate more tasks, and further streamline payment processes.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a resource involved in bill and vendor payment management activities is $78.
For this benefit, the composite has a productivity recapture rate of 50%. Resources spend half of the time they save on activities that generate business value, but not all reclaimed time is dedicated to value-added work.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
An organization’s prior tools and processes for bill and vendor payment management activities.
Salaries of resources managing bill and vendor payment management activities.
The degree to which resources recapture time savings toward productive activities.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $43,000.
Productivity improvement on bill and vendor payment management activities by Year 3 with QuickBooks Bill Pay
Time saved on bill and vendor payment management activities over three years with QuickBooks Bill Pay
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | Average time spent on bill and vendor payment management activities per month before QuickBooks Bill Pay (hours) | Composite | 75 | 75 | 75 | |
C2 | Total time spent on bill and vendor payment management activities before QuickBooks Bill Pay (hours) | C1*12 months | 900 | 900 | 900 | |
C3 | Productivity improvement on bill and vendor payment management activities with QuickBooks Bill Pay | Composite | 50% | 55% | 60% | |
C4 | Time saved on bill and vendor payment management activities with QuickBooks Bill Pay (hours) | C2*C3 | 450 | 495 | 540 | |
C5 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a blended resource that uses QuickBooks Bill Pay | A5 | $78 | $78 | $78 | |
C6 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Ct | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Bill Pay | C4*C5*C6 | $17,550 | $19,305 | $21,060 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Ctr | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Bill Pay (risk-adjusted) | $15,795 | $17,375 | $18,954 | ||
Three-year total: $52,124 | Three-year present value: $42,959 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents said that adopting QuickBooks Payments improved their invoicing and payment processing efficiency. The platform enabled their organizations to generate invoices easily, accept a range of payment methods — including credit cards, ACH transfers, and digital wallets — and automatically track transactions within their accounting systems. As a result, organizations spent less time on manual tasks, gained better control over cash flow, and improved visibility into outstanding customer balances. These improvements allowed them to take a more proactive approach to collections, minimize payment delays, and keep their financial operations running smoothly.
The CEO at a healthcare company shared that QuickBooks Payments streamlined their customer billing and reconciliation processes. Compared to the organization’s prior paper-based billing methods, QuickBooks Payments saved the interviewee’s organization approximately 20 hours of work each week. They said: “With QuickBooks Payments, having it integrated creates significant efficiencies because we can create [an invoice] and process it all through QuickBooks itself. It cuts down on the amount of time we have to spend reconciling transactions, because it is done automatically for us.”
The interviewee shared that QuickBooks Payments enabled their organization to allow customers to pay invoices online, virtually eliminating check payments and associated administration efforts. Additionally, automated reminders helped ensure timely payments, further reducing the need for manual follow-ups and improving cash flow management.
Similarly, the CFO at a professional services firm shared that online payments enabled by QuickBooks Payments reduced reconciliation work and errors because payments were automatically matched to invoices within QuickBooks, ensuring accurate and efficient processing.
In the survey, 65% of respondents whose organizations used QuickBooks Payments reported a reduction in time spent creating and sending invoices payable online. On average, respondents indicated that they improved online invoicing efficiency by 56%. Further, 55% of respondents that used QuickBooks Payments saw a reduction in time spent reconciling deposits with invoices. On average, respondents experienced a 63% reduction in effort related to this reconciliation work.
Average | |
---|---|
Creating and sending invoices payable online | 56 |
Setting up different payment methods | 45 |
Managing outstanding invoices | 42 |
Getting paid by customers | 36 |
Tracking incoming customer payments | 51 |
Reconciling deposits with invoices | 63 |
Identifying and reconciling transaction fees on amounts received | 54 |
Base: 65 decision-makers with experience using Intuit products at their organization
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Intuit, January 2025
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Finance resources at the composite organization spend 60 hours per month on payments activities, such as creating and sending invoices payable online, setting up different payment methods, managing outstanding invoices, tracking incoming customer payments, and reconciling deposits with invoices before adopting QuickBooks Payments. Over one year, these efforts total 720 hours.
With QuickBooks Payments, the composite organization reduces the time spent managing payments activities by 60%.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a resource involved in payments activities is $78.
For this benefit, the composite has a productivity recapture rate of 50%. Resources spend half of the time they save on activities that generate business value, but not all reclaimed time is dedicated to value-added work.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
An organization’s prior tools and processes for bill and vendor payment management activities.
Salaries of resources managing bill and vendor payment management activities.
The degree to which resources recapture time savings toward productive activities.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $41,000.
Productivity improvement on payments activities by Year 3 with QuickBooks Payments
Time saved on payment processing and financial transaction management activities over three years with QuickBooks Payments
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | Average time spent on payment processing and financial transaction management activities per month before QuickBooks Payments (hours) | Composite | 60 | 60 | 60 | |
D2 | Total time spent on payment processing and financial transaction management activities before QuickBooks Payments (hours) | D1*12 months | 720 | 720 | 720 | |
D3 | Productivity improvement on payment processing and financial transaction management activities with QuickBooks Payments | Interviews and survey | 60% | 65% | 70% | |
D4 | Time saved on payment processing and financial transaction management activities with QuickBooks Payments (hours) | D2*D3 | 432 | 468 | 504 | |
D5 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a blended resource that uses QuickBooks Payments | A5 | $78 | $78 | $78 | |
D6 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Dt | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Payments | D4*D5*D6 | $16,848 | $18,252 | $19,656 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Dtr | Productivity improvement with QuickBooks Payments (risk-adjusted) | $15,163 | $16,427 | $17,690 | ||
Three-year total: $49,280 | Three-year present value: $40,652 |
Evidence and data. Prior to adopting Mailchimp, organizations faced inefficiencies managing email campaigns and customer communications. Marketing resources spent excessive time manually creating, sending, and tracking marketing emails across disconnected tools, which delayed execution and made it difficult to maintain consistency across campaigns. These challenges slowed marketing operations and increased the administrative burden.
With Mailchimp, organizations automated key aspects of their email marketing workflows, including scheduling, audience segmentation, and performance tracking, and thus reduced the manual workload required to run campaigns. Centralized tools and real-time analytics enabled marketing resources to work with greater speed and precision. They could quickly adapt email marketing strategies based on live performance data to ensure campaigns were more compelling. Additionally, they could optimize audience segmentation to deliver more tailored messaging that was better aligned with customer behaviors and preferences.
The CEO at a healthcare company said: “Mailchimp has allowed us to stay in contact with prospects automatically, without manual effort. It helps us track engagement signals, like email opens and clicks, so we know the right time to send follow-up information. Automating this process has been very helpful, especially since many prospects may take months before converting.”
The marketing director at an agriculture company said Mailchimp streamlined their email marketing efforts. By automating weekly campaigns and event-driven messages and enabling segmentation and personalization, Mailchimp reduced manual work and boosted customer engagement. The interviewee also noted that Mailchimp saved time, improved decision-making by providing clear performance metrics (such as open rates, click-through rates, and campaign revenue), and enabled more targeted marketing optimizations.
In the survey, 62% of respondents whose organizations used Mailchimp reported a reduction in time spent on content personalization. Respondents indicated they reduced the time spent on overall email campaign creation by 56%. Additionally, 56% and 49% of respondents experienced efficiency improvements in customer communications with audience segmentation and email campaign creation, respectively. These results highlight significant productivity gains driven by Mailchimp’s tools.
Average | |
---|---|
Email campaign creation | 56 |
Customer engagement analytics and reporting | 40 |
Customer communications with audience segmentation | 51 |
Employee communications with audience segmentation | 54 |
Employee onboarding | 17 |
Content personalization | 48 |
Content development | 34 |
Base: 39 decision-makers with experience using Intuit products at their organization
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Intuit, January 2025
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization spends 20 hours per month on email marketing activities before Mailchimp, equating to 240 hours per year.
With Mailchimp, the composite organization experiences a 45% productivity improvement on email marketing activities in Year 1, 50% in Year 2, and 55% in Year 3 as users optimize their workflows, automate more campaigns, and refine their use of Mailchimp’s audience and reporting features.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a resource managing email marketing activities with Mailchimp is $75.
For this benefit, the composite has a productivity recapture rate of 50%. Resources spend half of the time they save on activities that generate business value, but not all reclaimed time is dedicated to value-added work.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
An organization’s prior tools and processes for email marketing activities.
Salaries of resources managing email marketing.
The degree to which resources recapture time savings toward productive activities.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $10,000.
Productivity improvement on email marketing activities by Year 3 with Mailchimp
Total time saved on email marketing activities over three years with Mailchimp
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | Average time spent per month on email marketing activities before Mailchimp (hours) | Composite | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
E2 | Total time spent on email marketing activities before Mailchimp (hours) | E1*12 months | 240 | 240 | 240 | |
E3 | Productivity improvement on email marketing activities with Mailchimp | Interviews and survey | 45% | 50% | 55% | |
E4 | Total time saved on email marketing activities with Mailchimp (hours) | E2*E3 | 108 | 120 | 132 | |
E5 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a Mailchimp user | Composite | $75 | $75 | $75 | |
E6 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Et | Productivity improvement with Mailchimp | E4*E5*E6 | $4,050 | $4,500 | $4,950 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Etr | Productivity improvement with Mailchimp (risk-adjusted) | $3,645 | $4,050 | $4,455 | ||
Three-year total: $12,150 | Three-year present value: $10,008 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted how improving payroll and tax management with QuickBooks Payroll eliminated their organizations’ risks associated with delays and errors in tax remittances. Manual payroll processes in prior environments often resulted in delayed tax remittances, calculation errors, and missed deadlines — issues that led to noncompliance and penalty fees. Automating payroll calculations, tax withholdings, and remittance filing in QuickBooks Payroll ensured that interviewees’ organizations made tax payments on time and in full with greater accuracy.
The CFO at a construction company said that their organization often faced penalties for late tax payments due to manual processes and delays. The interviewee noted that the company incurred penalties three times per year, with each instance costing between $5,000 to $10,000. Since implementing QuickBooks Payroll, the organization has not received any penalties or late payment notices.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization has 14 employees.
On average, 20% of employees experience payroll noncompliance incidents due to late tax remittance.
The average fee per noncompliance incident is $5,000.
Due to automated tax remittance with QuickBooks Payroll, the composite organization eliminates noncompliance incidents and associated fees, saving $15,000 each year.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
Number of employees.
Average fee per noncompliance incident.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $34,000.
Avoided noncompliance incidents per year
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | Employees | Composite | 14 | 14 | 14 | |
F2 | Average payroll tax noncompliance incident rate per employee | Interviews and survey | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
F3 | Noncompliance incidents before QuickBooks Payroll (rounded) | F1*F2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
F4 | Average fee per noncompliance incident | Composite | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | |
Ft | Noncompliance penalty fee cost savings from automated tax remittance with QuickBooks Payroll | F3*F4 | $15,000 | $15,000 | $15,000 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Ftr | Noncompliance penalty fee cost savings from automated tax remittance with QuickBooks Payroll (risk-adjusted) | $13,500 | $13,500 | $13,500 | ||
Three-year total: $40,500 | Three-year present value: $33,573 |
Evidence and data. QuickBooks Bill Pay provided interviewees’ organizations with a centralized, automated platform that streamlined the entire bill management process. By integrating invoice tracking, automatic payment reminders, and due date notifications, they eliminated the need for manual oversight and reduced the risk of missed vendor payment deadlines. In addition to eliminating late fees, organizations improved cash flow management through real-time visibility into upcoming payments and outstanding invoices, and they fostered stronger vendor relationships by ensuring timely, reliable payments.
The CFO at a professional services company shared that their organization automated recurring bill payments with QuickBooks Bill Pay, enabling them to reduce late fees. They shared: “Because something got delayed or someone forgot to send it out before, the fees could be $300 to $400. Now we can set bill payments as recurring, which has reduced late payments.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite has an average invoice value of $5,000.
On average, vendors charge a 5% late fee on the invoice value, resulting in an average late fee cost of $250 per instance for the composite organization.
Before adopting QuickBooks Bill Pay, the composite organization incurs five instances of late fees each year.
Due to automated tax remittance with QuickBooks Bill Pay, the composite organization eliminates late fees, saving $1,800 each year.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
An organization’s prior tools and processes for bill payments.
Average invoice value.
The frequency of late fees in the prior environment.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3,000.
Vendor late fee instances avoided annually with QuickBooks Bill Pay
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1 | Average invoice value | Composite | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | |
G2 | Average late fee rate charged by vendors | Interviews and survey | 5% | 5% | 5% | |
G3 | Fee per instance of late vendor payment | G1*G2 | $250 | $250 | $250 | |
G4 | Late fee instances before QuickBooks Bill Pay | Composite | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Gt | Vendor late fee cost savings with QuickBooks Bill Pay | G3*G4 | $1,250 | $1,250 | $1,250 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Gtr | Vendor late fee cost savings with QuickBooks Bill Pay (risk-adjusted) | $1,125 | $1,125 | $1,125 | ||
Three-year total: $3,375 | Three-year present value: $2,798 |
Evidence and data. Mailchimp enabled interviewees’ organizations to design and deliver targeted, personalized email campaigns efficiently. Its segmentation and personalization tools allowed them to tailor communications based on customer behavior, demographics, and engagement history for more relevant outreach and stronger engagement. Interviewees said that having visibility into campaign performance through Mailchimp’s built-in analytics resulted in improved open and click-through rates.
Automation features also allowed organizations to send timely follow-ups, onboarding sequences, and promotional offers without manual effort for improved consistency across customer touchpoints. By integrating Mailchimp with QuickBooks, organizations could link their campaigns directly to actual purchase data, which allowed them to gain deeper insights into how marketing drove sales. This connected approach helped organizations make more informed decisions, build stronger customer relationships, increase conversion rates, and improve overall marketing outcomes.
The director of marketing at an agriculture company shared that their organization used Mailchimp to enhance weekly email marketing efforts, resulting in improved customer engagement and increased sales. With Mailchimp, the organization improved email campaign segmentation based on factors such as geographical location and implemented automated emails for abandoned cart recovery and postpurchase follow-ups. The interviewee highlighted that Mailchimp was particularly useful for its QuickBooks integration, which enabled data syncing and customer list management. As a result, the organization saw improvement in various engagement metrics including click-through rate and open rate, and it recovered $15,000 in annual sales through abandoned cart reminder emails.
The CEO at a healthcare organization described how their organization used Mailchimp to enhance engagement with prospective clients. Using Mailchimp, the organization set up automated drip emails to maintain regular contact with potential clients without needing manual follow-ups. They shared that Mailchimp’s automation features enabled their organization to stay connected with these prospects efficiently.
Of the survey respondents whose organizations used Mailchimp, 40% reported more relevant and effective email personalization. Among the 18 respondents who saw improved marketing campaign performance, there was a 32% average increase in sent emails, a 39% improvement in open rates, and a 56% increase in click-through rates.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Before adopting Mailchimp, the composite organization sends 150,000 sales-targeted emails annually. These are emails specifically aimed at driving sales, such as promotional offers, product recommendations, and other marketing content tailored to potential customers. The volume of sales-targeted emails increases by 5% year over year, reaching 157,500 in Year 2 and 165,375 in Year 3.
After adopting Mailchimp, the composite organization leverages email automation features and increases its sent emails by 30%.
The composite organization starts with an email open rate of 12%. After adopting Mailchimp, enhanced segmentation and personalization drive a 40% improvement in open rates, increasing the open rate to 17%
Before Mailchimp, the composite organization has a click-through rate of 5%. With Mailchimp, the click-through rate increases by 55% to 8%.
The composite organization has a conversion rate of 8%, an average order value of $2,500, and a profit margin of 12%.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The scope and effectiveness of an organization’s prior email marketing efforts, including emails sent annually, open rate, and click-through rate.
Other organizational factors, including conversion rate, average order value, and profit margin.
The skill and expertise of Mailchimp users in developing and executing email campaigns.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $17,000.
Email open rate improvement with Mailchimp
Click-through rate improvement with Mailchimp
Increased sales from improved customer engagement over three years with Mailchimp
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Volume of sales-targeted emails sent before Mailchimp | Composite | 150,000 | 157,500 | 165,375 | |
H2 | Increase in emails sent with Mailchimp | Interviews and survey | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
H3 | Subtotal: Emails sent with Mailchimp | H1*(1+H2) | 195,000 | 204,750 | 214,988 | |
H4 | Open rate before Mailchimp | Composite | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
H5 | Open rate improvement with Mailchimp | Interviews and survey | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
H6 | Open rate with Mailchimp (rounded) | H4*(1+H5) | 17% | 17% | 17% | |
H7 | Subtotal: Incremental emails opened with Mailchimp | H3*(H6-H4) | 9,750 | 10,238 | 10,749 | |
H8 | Click-through rate before Mailchimp | Composite | 5% | 5% | 5% | |
H9 | Click-through rate improvement with Mailchimp | Interviews and survey | 55% | 55% | 55% | |
H10 | Click-through rate with Mailchimp (rounded) | H8*(1+H9) | 8% | 8% | 8% | |
H11 | Conversion rate | Composite | 8% | 8% | 8% | |
H12 | Subtotal: Incremental orders with Mailchimp | H7*(H10-H8)*H11 | 23 | 25 | 26 | |
H13 | Average order value | Composite | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | |
H14 | Profit margin | TEI methodology | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
Ht | Increased sales from improved customer engagement with Mailchimp | H12*H13*H14 | $6,900 | $7,500 | $7,800 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Htr | Increased sales from improved customer engagement with Mailchimp (risk-adjusted) | $6,210 | $6,750 | $7,020 | ||
Three-year total: $19,980 | Three-year present value: $16,498 |
Evidence and data. By adopting QuickBooks products and Mailchimp, interviewees’ organizations could eliminate costs tied to outdated financial and email marketing systems. Among survey respondents who reported savings, 70% said they replaced or discontinued prior accounting solutions, 45% retired stand-alone bill payment services, and 40% eliminated legacy payroll systems. These changes reduced overhead and allowed teams to consolidate operations onto a single platform, which drove cost efficiency and operational simplification.
Average | |
---|---|
Accounting | 46 |
Payroll | 41 |
Payment merchant services | 45 |
Bill payment services | 56 |
Base: 40 decision-makers with experience using Intuit products at their organization
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Intuit, January 2025
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization retires its prior financial management point solution, which costs $3,000 in Year 1. With a 5% YOY increase, the cost grows to $3,150 in Year 2 and $3,308 in Year 3.
The composite organization retires its prior payroll point solution, which costs $4,000 in Year 1. With a 5% YOY increase, the cost grows to $4,200 in Year 2 and $4,410 in Year 3.
The composite organization retires its prior marketing automation solution, which costs $2,000 in Year 1. With a 5% YOY increase, the cost grows to $2,100 in Year 2 and $2,205 in Year 3.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The extent to which organizations relied on legacy solutions prior to Intuit and their specific costs.
The speed at which an organization transitions to Intuit products, which may affect the rate of legacy cost savings year over year.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $21,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I1 | Average cost of a financial management /accounting point solution | Interviews and survey | $3,000 | $3,150 | $3,308 | |
I2 | Average cost of a payroll point solution | Interviews and survey | $4,000 | $4,200 | $4,410 | |
I3 | Average cost of a marketing automation point solution | Interviews and survey | $2,000 | $2,100 | $2,205 | |
It | Legacy solution cost savings | I1+I2+I3 | $9,000 | $9,450 | $9,923 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Itr | Legacy solution cost savings (risk-adjusted) | $8,100 | $8,505 | $8,931 | ||
Three-year total: $25,536 | Three-year present value: $21,102 |
Interviewees and survey respondents mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Better together value proposition. In the survey, 83% of respondents reported that having multiple Intuit products was more valuable to their organization compared to using individual products from other vendors. Similarly, several interviewees shared that having multiple QuickBooks products streamlined workflows, enhanced data accuracy, and provided a more comprehensive view of their business operations. The CFO at a construction company said: “You log into one system, one software, and you can do everything there. If you’re looking for information, you have one version of the truth because the system captures all touchpoints — accounts payable, accounts receivable, cash, and even sales tax.” Additionally, the CFO at a professional services firm said: “I believe in the Intuit ecosystem. For example, having payroll inside of QuickBooks is a game changer. Putting it all in one ecosystem is way more efficient and saves time and money. I like being able to go into one platform or portal and take care of most of what I need to do as a bookkeeper and accountant all in one place.”
Base: 156 decision-makers with experience using Intuit products at their organization
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Intuit, January 2025
Improved visibility and decision-making. Interviewees shared that the improved visibility provided by QuickBooks enhanced decision-making. The director of marketing at an agriculture company described this benefit further: “I think it has a financial impact because it is easier to access data and make changes, and that affects profitability. My years of experience tell me that the easier it is to get information, the easier it is to make decisions that impact what we’re doing tomorrow, and hopefully, those decisions will lead to greater revenue and profitability.”
Improved cash flow. Interviewees highlighted that QuickBooks helped their organizations manage cash flow more effectively by speeding up payment collection, which reduced the need for large reserves. For example, the CFO at a construction company shared their organization saw a reduction in DSO after adopting QuickBooks. They noted that QuickBooks enabled their organization to offer quick and convenient payment methods and send automated invoice reminders, helping customers pay in a timelier manner.
Avoided third-party accounting firm costs. The CEO at a healthcare company reported that their organization avoided CPA costs by using QuickBooks. They noted that the automation and integration features helped their organization provide accurate and clean financial records, which significantly reduced associated tax filing costs. They estimated that the ability to hand off a clean set of books to their CPAs saved their organization at least $10,000 on tax preparation annually.
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Intuit products and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Support for business expansion. The CEO at a healthcare company saw QuickBooks as a solution that could support their organization’s future expansion to new locations. They shared: “There’s quite a peace of mind in knowing that QuickBooks can grow with us. We’ve worked very hard to ensure that we have systems in place that don’t inhibit our growth. As we’ve acquired additional locations, we can quickly roll the financial operations over to QuickBooks and won’t skip a beat. This has been a key factor in our ability to grow. When we start a new division or a new location, being able to replicate everything is pretty significant. We don’t even want to think about what that would take if we had to start from scratch.”
Ongoing feature enhancements, including AI functionalities. Intuit continues to release product enhancements and features, increasing potential value and ROI for the interviewees’ organizations. For example, the CFO at a professional services firm shared excitement about innovative product features, including the genAI-powered Intuit Assist offering. They shared that their organization plans to adopt this offering in the future to enable AI-driven bookkeeping.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jtr | Fees to Intuit | $0 | $17,850 | $18,743 | $19,681 | $56,274 | $46,504 |
Ktr | Implementation, training, and ongoing management | $26,618 | $8,190 | $8,190 | $8,190 | $51,188 | $46,985 |
Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $26,618 | $26,040 | $26,933 | $27,871 | $107,461 | $93,489 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations incurred annual fees to Intuit for the products they used. Pricing varied depending on products, plans, and add-on features. QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Payroll, and Mailchimp followed a tiered subscription structure, with more advanced plans and additional features resulting in higher costs. Smaller organizations often selected basic functionalities at lower price points.
For QuickBooks Payments and QuickBooks Bill Pay, organizations incurred transaction-based fees that fluctuated with payment volume, payment method (such as credit card or ACH), and service choices like expedited processing. Higher transaction volumes and premium services led to higher fees, which scaled with the organization’s revenue and payment activity. While total costs rose with usage, the time and effort saved increased even more quickly, making the investment more valuable at higher volumes.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization pays an annual licensing fee of $1,000 for QuickBooks Online in Year 1. This cost increases by 5% YOY.
The composite organization pays an annual licensing fee of $3,000 for QuickBooks Payroll in Year 1. This cost increases by 5% YOY.
The composite organization pays an annual transaction volume fee of $6,000 for QuickBooks Payments in Year 1. This cost increases by 5% YOY.
The composite organization pays an annual transaction volume fee of $5,000 for QuickBooks Bill Pay in Year 1. This cost increases by 5% YOY.
The composite organization pays an annual licensing fee of $2,000 for Mailchimp in Year 1. This cost increases by 5% YOY.
Pricing may vary. Contact Intuit for additional details.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The individual Intuit products an organization adopts.
Licensing factors, including plan types and add-on features.
The pace at which an organization rolls out Intuit products over time.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $47,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J1 | QuickBooks Online licensing fees | Composite | $1,000 | $1,050 | $1,103 | |
J2 | QuickBooks Payroll licensing fees | Composite | $3,000 | $3,150 | $3,308 | |
J3 | QuickBooks Payments transaction volume fees | Composite | $6,000 | $6,300 | $6,615 | |
J4 | QuickBooks Bill Pay transaction volume fees | Composite | $5,000 | $5,250 | $5,513 | |
J5 | Mailchimp licensing fees | Composite | $2,000 | $2,100 | $2,205 | |
Jt | Fees to Intuit | J1+J2+J3+J4+J5 | $0 | $17,000 | $17,850 | $18,744 |
Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
Jtr | Fees to Intuit (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $17,850 | $18,743 | $19,681 | |
Three-year total: $56,274 | Three-year present value: $46,504 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees incurred labor costs associated with implementation, training, and ongoing management of their Intuit product deployments. They shared the following experiences:
Implementation. Implementation effort for the interviewees’ organizations varied depending on the specific Intuit products and existing system complexity. For instance, the CFO at a construction company shared that it took approximately one week to get QuickBooks Online up and running and two weeks to set up QuickBooks Payroll. They added that the setup process for Mailchimp was relatively faster.
Training. The marketing director at an agriculture company said that getting up to speed with Mailchimp took less than 5 hours but noted that training requirements could be higher for resources without prior experience with email marketing platforms. The CFO at a construction company shared that basic familiarization with QuickBooks Online took about one week but highlighted that employees required ongoing learning as their organization explored more advanced features.
Ongoing management. The director of marketing at an agriculture company noted minimal ongoing management requirements for their organization’s use of QuickBooks products and Mailchimp, stating that each required less than 5% of an FTEs effort.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization implements QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Payroll, QuickBooks Payments, QuickBooks Bill Pay, and Mailchimp in the initial period of the investment.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a resource participating in implementation, training, and ongoing management efforts is $78.
Implementation efforts require an average of 25 hours per product.
Four users participate in 5 hours of training per product.
Each year, ongoing management requires 20 hours of effort.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The individual Intuit products an organization adopts.
Implementation of Intuit products over time.
Costs of resources involved in implementation, training, and ongoing management.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $47,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K1 | Products used | Composite | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
K2 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a resource dedicated to implementation | A5 | $78 | $78 | $78 | $78 |
K3 | Average hours dedicated to implementation per product | Composite | 25 | |||
K4 | Subtotal: Implementation costs | K1*K2*K3 | $9,750 | |||
K5 | Users participating in training | Composite | 4 | |||
K6 | Hours of training per product | Interviews and survey | 5 | |||
K7 | Subtotal: Training costs | K1*K2*K5*K6 | $7,800 | |||
K8 | Hours dedicated to ongoing management per product | Interviews and survey | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
K9 | Subtotal: Ongoing management costs | K1*K2*K8 | $7,800 | $7,800 | $7,800 | $7,800 |
Kt | Implementation, training, and ongoing management | K4+K7+K9 | $25,350 | $7,800 | $7,800 | $7,800 |
Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
Ktr | Implementation, training, and ongoing management (risk-adjusted) | $26,618 | $8,190 | $8,190 | $8,190 | |
Three-year total: $51,188 | Three-year present value: $46,985 |
Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | ($26,618) | ($26,040) | ($26,933) | ($27,871) | ($107,461) | ($93,489) |
Total benefits | $0 | $114,082 | $123,540 | $132,749 | $370,372 | $305,548 |
Net benefits | ($26,618) | $88,042 | $96,608 | $104,878 | $262,910 | $212,059 |
ROI | 227% | |||||
Payback | <6 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in the Intuit Platform.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that the Intuit Platform can have on an organization.
Interviewed Intuit stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to the Intuit Platform.
Interviewed four decision-makers and surveyed 156 respondents at organizations using the Intuit Platform to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews and survey using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Role | Industry | Region | Revenue | Employees | Intuit Products |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEO | Healthcare | North America | $5 million | 90 |
• QuickBooks Online • QuickBooks Payments • Mailchimp |
Marketing director | Agriculture | North America | $7 million | 7 |
• QuickBooks Online • QuickBooks Payments • Mailchimp |
CFO | Professional services | North America | $10 million | 14 |
• QuickBooks Online • QuickBooks Payroll • QuickBooks Payments • QuickBooks Bill Pay |
CFO | Construction | North America | $17 million | 18 |
• QuickBooks Online • QuickBooks Payroll • QuickBooks Bill Pay |
ROLE | |
---|---|
Manager | 43% |
Director | 38% |
Vice president | 13% |
C-level executive | 6% |
INDUSTRY | |
---|---|
Construction | 11% |
Financial services and/or insurance | 8% |
Technology and/or technology services | 8% |
Business or professional services | 7% |
Advertising and/or marketing | 6% |
Healthcare | 6% |
Retail | 6% |
Consumer services | 6% |
Manufacturing and materials | 6% |
Education and/or nonprofits | 5% |
Agriculture, food, and/or beverage | 4% |
Energy, utilities, and/or waste management | 4% |
Transportation and logistics | 4% |
Consumer product goods | 3% |
Electronics | 3% |
Media and/or leisure | 3% |
Legal services | 3% |
Telecommunications services | 2% |
Chemicals and/or metals | 1% |
Government | 1% |
Travel and hospitality | 1% |
ANNUAL REVENUE | |
---|---|
$2.5M to $4.99M | 26% |
$5M to $9.99M | 33% |
$10M to $19.99M | 19% |
$20M to $49.99M | 10% |
$50M to $99.99M | 3% |
$100M to $499.99M | 7% |
$500M to $1B | 1% |
More than $1B | 1% |
EMPLOYEES | |
---|---|
2 to 50 employees | 62% |
51 to 200 employees | 28% |
201 to 500 employees | 6% |
501 to 1000 employees | 3% |
1001 to 3000 employees | 1% |
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Intuit and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in the Intuit Platform. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with the Intuit Platform based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Intuit or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Intuit and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Intuit make no warranties of any kind.
Intuit reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Intuit provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Forrester fielded the double-blind survey using a third-party survey partner.
Zahra Azzaoui
June 2025
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html