Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By AI PCs With 5G And APEX PC As A Service (PCaaS)
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT™ STUDY COMMISSIONED BY DELL TECHNOLOGIES AND VERIZON BUSINESS, MAY 2025
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT™ STUDY COMMISSIONED BY DELL TECHNOLOGIES AND VERIZON BUSINESS, MAY 2025
Dell APEX PC as a Service (PCaaS) gives organizations the flexibility to enable users with Dell AI PCs with 5G, which may support seamless access to AI workstreams, improve connectivity and productivity, and deliver better business results. Organizations may save IT personnel productivity by reducing the required device lifecycle management tasks while also reducing the total cost of ownership for hardware. Dell PCaaS customers may also realize hiring and budget flexibility for IT organizations, enabling better support across distributed workforces.
According to Forrester’s Digital Workplace And Employee Technology Survey, 2024, nearly half of decision-maker respondents indicated their organization would accelerate its refresh rate for employee PCs in the following year to take advantage of new hardware technologies, such as AI PCs and 5G-connected devices. Devices like AI PCs allow users to access on-device AI applications while offering fast and secure connectivity to cloud-based large language models (LLMs), which enables employees to deliver the benefits of AI applications and increase productivity to their businesses. Using 5G-connected devices, employees can stay seamlessly connected with applications despite high bandwidth and low latency characteristics. However, with an increase in distributed workforces and varieties of devices available to organizations, management of the device lifecycle is more complicated and labor-intensive than ever.
The rise of device as a service (DaaS) — subscription services for traditional IT categories like devices — shifts employee device purchasing from a one-time fixed cost to a continuous expenditure, which is an initiative that can improve digital employee experience while offering budget, hiring, and project flexibility to a company’s IT organization. Furthermore, IT leaders must balance the ease of supporting a standardized fleet of devices against providing users with newer devices that take advantage of new trends and technologies such as AI. Surveyed IT leaders indicated device refresh rates are accelerating primarily to take advantage of new AI hardware capabilities and to provide new devices to employees that can help maximize productivity and minimize device-related downtime.
Dell Technologies and Verizon commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Dell AI PCs with 5G and Dell APEX PCaaS. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Dell AI PCs with 5G purchased with PCaaS on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using AI PCs with 5G and Dell APEX PCaaS and four decision-makers from organizations that are managing their user device lifecycles internally. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees from organizations using Dell APEX PCaaS and combined the results into a single composite organization that is an industry-agnostic organization with 4,000 Dell devices.
The interviewees highlighted that with Dell AI PCs with 5G purchased through PCaaS, their organizations’ users can seamlessly operate complex AI workloads requiring low latencies on newer devices, which improves productivity, reduces downtime, and delivers superior business results depending on the use cases. The organizations’ IT departments saved on employee labor across the device lifecycle by moving valuable IT talent off device lifecycle management tasks and onto high-impact IT projects, avoiding labor and hiring costs. Interviewees also said their organizations reduced costs related to hardware expenditure and shipping.
Base: 116 information workers who are technology decision-makers and own some desktops or laptops their organization uses
Source: Forrester’s Digital Workplace And Employee Technology Survey, 2024
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Avoided device lifecycle support costs of nearly 35% per device ($341.80 per device). The composite organization eliminates IT personnel support and management effort for its device lifecycle with Dell PCaaS. This saves the organization nearly 35% of the required support costs measured by IT FTE labor.
Avoided hardware refresh costs of 3%. By sourcing a homogenous fleet of devices through Dell PCaaS, the composite organization avoids 3% of the cost of its previous device fleet while reducing vendor management costs and refreshing devices more frequently.
Increased annual revenue of $675,000 from improved device connectivity and functionality. With Dell AI PCs with 5G and Dell APEX PCaaS, the composite organization improves connectivity and functionality across several subsets of its user groups. This results in better business outcomes, more revenue, and more profitability.
Avoided cloud consumption costs for AI modeling by up to 50%. The composite provides Dell PCaaS subscriptions to select subsets of AI developers and power users, which enables them to carry out some tasks on their own devices that previously would have required consumption of public cloud compute resources.
Avoided personnel hires of three IT FTEs. By reducing IT’s burden in managing the device lifecycle, the composite organization is able to reallocate several FTEs previously tasked with these activities to other higher-value IT projects. This avoids hires who would otherwise have been needed to staff these projects.
Elimination of 75% of device downtime for users. The composite organization’s users benefit from flexible repair or replacement options for devices that experience issues, and this improves resolution time for critical, productivity-impacting issues by 75% or up to three days. Furthermore, the users benefit from newer, faster devices that experience fewer minor issues.
Shipping cost reduction of 50%. Because the composite organization’s users receive their devices imaged and provisioned directly from Dell, it reduces one-way shipping costs on both ends of the device lifecycle. In addition, due to a fleet of new devices, users experience fewer issues that require repair or replacement, which drives down the cost of expedited, off-cycle shipping.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Improved sustainability. Dell PCaaS helps the composite organization achieve sustainability benchmarks when it relates to hardware.
Improved connectivity. Having 5G-connected PCs allows the composite’s users to connect to 5G networks without the need for additional hardware or hotspots required in the past.
Improved security posture. With Dell PCaaS and device consistency, there are inherently fewer variables for the composite’s IT and security operations teams to watch for across the device fleet, improving security posture. Dell 5G devices offer access to secure connectivity options through end-to-end encryption of cellular networks and authentication protocols.
Budget flexibility. The composite organization pays for Dell PCaaS on a monthly payment model versus making an up-front capital expenditure.
Improved end-user experience. With Dell PCaaS, the composite’s users receive their devices faster, receive support resolution an average of three days more promptly, operate on hardware that is one to two years newer, and can work with Dell to procure the support or devices they need. Devices configured with 5G offer employees flexibility for work outside of an office or typical Wi-Fi range.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Lifecycle costs with Dell PCaaS. As part of the monthly per-device fees, the composite organization pays for Dell ProDeploy (an end-to-end service to get new devices from the factory to the user up and running), ProSupport, Asset Recovery Services, and recycling services. Internal resources still need to perform some tasks, such as managing the initial Dell procurement process and creating and managing central images or systems.
Subscription costs for devices through Dell. The composite organization subscribes 4,000 devices and 8,000 peripherals through Dell on a 36-month term. These costs include a blended rate for each device across all device configurations (from AI PCs with 5G including annual fees to base model devices) for the composite organization’s device-type breakdown.
Switching costs from the previous hardware provider. The composite organization incurs switching costs for other vendors as it transitions its fleet of devices to Dell PCaaS.
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $10.62 million over three years versus costs of $8.20 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $2.43 million and an ROI of 30%.
Per-device support savings during 36-month lifecycle (non-risk-adjusted)
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
Lifecycle service | Without Dell PCaaS (FTE hours only) | Dell PCaaS |
---|---|---|
Procurement | $107.27 | $75.09 |
Imaging, installation, final preparation | $160.29 | $163.85 |
Systems management | $312.62 | $293.86 |
Support | $364.11 | $86.90 |
Retrieval/retirement | $33.71 | $16.50 |
Total per-device cost (36 months) |
$978.00 | $636.19 |
Total per-device cost (monthly) | $27.17 | $17.67 |
PC Refresh Rates Increasing To Take Advantage Of New PC Capabilities Such As AI PCs and Connected Devices
Forrester research reveals that 38% of information workers who are technology decision-makers and own some desktops or laptops their organization uses said their enterprise planned to increase its refresh rate in the next year. They indicated one of the primary reasons is to take advantage of new device technologies, such as AI PCs and 5G connected PCs. 5G enables enterprises to deliver reliable, secure, mobile-centric connectivity to the users who require it the most. Traditional wireless technologies like Wi-Fi and Bluetooth don’t handle mobility well. Breaks in connectivity provide challenges in use cases requiring specific reliability and availability guarantees, particularly at the edge. Providing connected devices with 5G to end users across diverse use cases such as smart field service or smart manufacturing may allow organizations to increase operational efficiency, increase quality assurance, and decrease costs. Forrester anticipates that enthusiasm around AI PCs will grow significantly in 2025 as more companies adopt these devices, and IT decision-makers view this generation of PCs as a strategic tool to boost employee productivity, enhance collaboration, and extend both device performance and longevity. Although new hardware upgrades are typically seen as incremental, the emergence of AI computing powered by dedicated hardware is prompting many leaders to accelerate their organization’s AI PC testing. Another motivation for adopting AI PCs is to discourage employees from buying them on their own, which can lead to shadow IT and introduce potential security risks. This is particularly concerning because enterprise technology decision-makers often find it more difficult to manage and secure employee-owned devices compared to those supplied by the company. As the AI PC software ecosystem continues to evolve, Forrester predicts more organizations will invest in these devices to capitalize on emerging innovation opportunities. Furthermore, the ability to better connect users in the field or at the edge via 5G on their devices allows organizations to support edge intelligence efforts. Edge intelligence can empower enterprise stakeholders to enhance their organizations’ edge environments with real-time analysis and decision-making, ensuring continuous connectivity for hybrid, field, or critical users without relying on mobile hotspots or Wi-Fi infrastructure.
Role | Industry | Region | Users |
---|---|---|---|
SVP of IT and security | Agriculture | North America | ~500 |
Manager of site reliability engineering | Financial services | North America | ~1,000 |
Manager of I&O service management | Manufacturing | Europe | ~6,000 |
IT group enterprise infrastructure architect | Manufacturing | Global | ~5,000 |
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Sourcing devices across the needs of various users. Interviewees said that within their organizations, the different device requirements across user groups led to overpaying for small batches of devices or specification compromises across the fleet. Excess device cost or performance tradeoffs were common, and specialized users (e.g., AI developers, data scientists) often relied on outside public clouds to complete their more resource-intensive tasks.
Challenges pertaining to an increasingly mobile workforce. Having increasingly hybrid workforces meant the organizations spent more on shipping employee devices, especially in cases that required expedited shipping. Costs related to employee downtime were magnified in a hybrid work model because remote employees who could not physically retrieve loaner or replaced devices in the case of a device failure were subject to longer periods of time without their primary devices. Connectivity on legacy devices was also a challenge because many of the organizations’ devices lacked native mobile connectivity, which posed risks to access, bandwidth, and/or security for some users (e.g., those in the field or traveling). These device-related challenges limited the ability for these users to do their jobs in real time, as work — even time-sensitive work — was delayed until secure access could be established.
Limited personnel resources. As IT FTE requirements mounted throughout the device lifecycle, interviewees’ organizations increasingly lacked the resources to manage these tasks. It was increasingly difficult to hire and train the IT personnel responsible for these activities, which yielded inconsistencies in support for the organizations’ end users.
Costs related to a lack of standardization. Interviewees from organizations leveraging Dell PCaaS noted that before the investment with Dell, it was impossible to standardize their device fleets. Devices were often mixed and matched between vendors, technical specs, and software versions.
Support of older devices. Many of the interviewees both from organizations using Dell PCaaS and organizations that don’t reported device refresh cycles for owned devices in excess of five years. As a result, device failures were common as devices aged, which put additional burden on IT support resources while jeopardizing user productivity.
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that could:
Offer a range of configurable devices that would suit the needs of several user groups, including advanced users looking for AI-ready devices.
Support an increasingly hybrid or mobile workforce.
Offer flexibility in device configuration and refresh windows.
Remove the burden of support from limited IT personnel resources.
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the four interviewees from organizations using Dell APEX PCaaS, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite organization is a global, industry-agnostic organization with 4,000 total employees across varying user and device profiles. Before moving to the Dell PCaaS subscription model, the composite financed end-user devices from various vendors with an average refresh cycle of three years. The organization supported its end users’ devices with internal IT resources exclusively. As the organization refreshes users onto Dell PCaaS, some are selected for 5G-connected PCs or AI PCs based on their roles and responsibilities.
Worker type | Worker description | No. of workers | Primary device | Peripherals |
---|---|---|---|---|
Creators and designers | Multimedia creators who use AI to optimize workflows and create rich content | 600 | Laptop (20% with 5G connectivity) | 1 display, 1 docking station |
Knowledge workers | Everyday business users who use some AI applications to enhance productivity, creativity, and collaboration | 1,800 | Laptop (10% AI PC, 10% with 5G connectivity) | 1 display, 1 docking station |
AI developers | Users who create, optimize, and/or inference sophisticated AI models and workloads | 400 | Dell AI PC | 2 displays |
Power users (mobile and fixed) | Tech-savvy users who leverage computational power and AI-driver features to create complex tasks | 1,200 (800 mobile; 400 fixed) |
Mobile users: laptop Fixed users: desktop |
Mobile users: 1 display, 1 docking station Fixed users: 2 displays |
Total | 4,000 |
Industry agnostic
4,000 users/devices
4 user personas
Increasingly hybrid workforce
Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atr | Avoided device lifecycle services (annual) | $1,238,952 | $1,238,952 | $1,238,952 | $3,716,856 | $3,081,090 |
Btr | Avoided device acquisition and refresh costs | $2,497,380 | $2,497,380 | $2,497,380 | $7,492,140 | $6,210,614 |
Ctr | Avoided IT personnel hires through reskilling | $262,800 | $262,800 | $262,800 | $788,400 | $653,545 |
Dtr | Avoided user productivity losses due to device access | $63,840 | $63,840 | $63,840 | $191,520 | $158,761 |
Etr | Avoided shipping costs | $85,101 | $85,101 | $85,101 | $255,303 | $211,634 |
Ftr | Increased profit from better device connectivity and performance | $96,188 | $96,188 | $96,188 | $288,563 | $239,204 |
Gtr | Avoided cloud consumption costs for AI modeling | $27,000 | $27,000 | $27,000 | $81,000 | $67,145 |
Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $4,271,261 | $4,271,261 | $4,271,261 | $12,813,782 | $10,621,993 |
Evidence and data. Each interviewee shared specific results related to elimination of support and management effort for their organization’s device lifecycle with Dell PCaaS.
The IT group enterprise infrastructure architect in manufacturing explained that before their organization moved to Dell PCaaS, nonstandardization was rampant across the company’s wide range of geographies. This resulted in significant complications when it came to user device support, especially given the organization’s small team of six internal resources.
The interviewee explained: “We had every brand and every model of every brand somewhere in our [device landscape]. The service desk actually spent more time trying to find out what the brand and model they were dealing with was than actually solving the problem afterwards. It became apparent quite quickly that we needed to standardize. Especially because we’re in 85 countries in all time zones. Support was difficult and really expensive.”
After three years of device refreshes, the organization standardized on Dell PCaaS while also growing its device count by six times. This standardization led to many improvements to support times because devices are now imaged in minutes as opposed to hours. Additionally, despite the significant growth in device count, the interviewee said the same team of technicians supports users with 20% less effort than in the previous environment.
The SVP of IT and security at an agriculture organization said: “Support [provides] the biggest savings for me and my team. Whenever we have an issue with a laptop or a docking station or something like that, it’s a Dell problem now.” The interviewee further noted that Dell enables their organization to get to and maintain a standard for devices, which greatly facilitates support over the life of the device.
The manager of I&O services at another manufacturing organization spoke to the importance of Dell PCaaS while managing user devices across a highly distributed global company. They said that imaging machines previously required travel and time commitments for IT personnel but that using Dell PCaaS eliminated the need to travel for imaging altogether while delivering ready-to-use devices to end users two to three days sooner than before.
On aggregate, by leveraging Dell PCaaS, the interviewees’ organizations reduced or eliminated the IT FTE labor associated with specific tasks along the device lifecycle. Forrester analyzed the average amount of working time spent on each core device lifecycle activity and used this result to estimate the average monthly device lifecycle costs the composite organization avoids (measured in internal FTE resource hours) for the delivery of these services once it transitioned to Dell PCaaS.
The avoided costs in this benefit category represent each stage of the lifecycle broken down by average internal FTE labor cost (active labor) per stage on a per-device basis. These tasks include initial device procurement processes through Dell, the creation and management of a central image, and systems management. These calculations demonstrate an FTE at the composite organization saves just more than 6 hours per device during the three-year device cycle.
Each stage includes the following:
Procurement (one-time). Interviewees said using Dell Premier Connect saved time on tasks, including vendor and catalog management, negotiations, invoice management, and device search.
Imaging (one-time). This included:
Physical device setup (one-time). This included:
Support (annual). This included:
Retirement/recovery (one-time). This included:
Interviewees also said a self-service customer portal is available to gauge how much an organization’s current device assets are worth.
Modeling and assumptions. Interviewees said that by leveraging Dell PCaaS, their organizations reduced or eliminated the IT FTE labor associated with specific tasks along their device lifecycles. Forrester analyzed the average amount of working time spent on each core device lifecycle activity and used this to estimate the average monthly device lifecycle costs the composite organization avoids (measured in internal FTE resource hours) for the delivery of these services once it transitioned to Dell PCaaS.
For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Device lifecycle tasks are managed by internal resources exclusively.
The fully burdened hourly rate for a worker who supports the device lifecycle is $31.49. This weighted rate is based on multiple levels of IT seniority (e.g., PC technician, IT systems manager, procurement administrator) and their relative involvement.
A single device requires an average of $27.17 in IT FTE labor per year. This is the pre-risk-adjusted labor cost.
FTEs save more than 6 hours per device during the three-year device cycle.
Risks. These avoided costs can vary among organizations based on:
The skill and capacity of an organization’s IT resources managing the organization’s device lifecycle.
The number and breakdown of devices in
an organization.
Organizational specifics that affect lifecycle costs (e.g., legal holds on data in the retirement phase.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.1 million.
Avoided per-device monthly lifecycle services cost (non-risk-adjusted)
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | Users/devices | Composite | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
A2 | Procurement cost per device | Interviews and Forrester research | $2.98 | $2.98 | $2.98 | |
A3 | Imaging services cost per device | Interviews and Forrester research | $2.27 | $2.27 | $2.27 | |
A4 | Physical installation and basic setup costs per device | Interviews and Forrester research | $0.94 | $0.94 | $0.94 | |
A5 | Final preparation and migration cost per device | Interviews and Forrester research | $1.25 | $1.25 | $1.25 | |
A6 | Systems management cost per device | Interviews and Forrester research | $8.68 | $8.68 | $8.68 | |
A7 | Support cost per device | Interviews and Forrester research | $10.11 | $10.11 | $10.11 | |
A8 | Asset retirement/disposal cost per device | Interviews and Forrester research | $0.94 | $0.94 | $0.94 | |
A9 | Monthly device lifecycle cost per device | A2+A3+A4+A5+A6+ A7+A8 | $27.17 | $27.17 | $27.17 | |
At | Avoided device lifecycle services (annual) | A1*A9*12 months | $1,304,160 | $1,304,160 | $1,304,160 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓5% | |||||
Atr | Avoided device lifecycle services (annual) (risk-adjusted) | $1,238,952 | $1,238,952 | $1,238,952 | ||
Three-year total: $3,716,856 | Three-year present value: $3,081,090 |
Evidence and data. Most interviewees said that before Dell, their organizations refreshed end-user devices on an ongoing basis every three to five years on average. Several said their organization only refreshed devices on an as-needed basis, and that it could be more than five years between device refreshes. In addition, the organizations often invested in devices across several vendors and specifications to meet the needs of specific user groups, further contributing to varied device landscapes.
Interviewees said their organizations avoided the cost of owned devices as they began to refresh devices with those subscribed to through Dell. This also allowed the organizations to move capital expenditure to operating expenditure, which better aligns with organizational cost-reduction initiatives. Additionally, by sourcing devices across all types and specifications (e.g. Latitude laptops to Pro Max desktops) from Dell, organizations stand to save on a per-device basis by working with a single vendor.
One of the interviewees from an organization that doesn’t use Dell PCaaS noted that a separate vendor along with the company’s core device provider offers specialized hardware to technical users who require more powerful hardware for tasks such as AI model development.
Several interviewees noted their organization sources devices based on the cost at the time of need. As a result, the organizations’ device landscapes tend to incorporate devices from several different vendors, which requires some differentiation when it comes to imaging and support.
Interviewees said a major benefit of Dell PCaaS is agreeable financing across different regions as well as competitive pricing. One interviewee noted that it was roughly 10% cheaper to deploy Dell devices across their organization than to use a competitor and that reliability is nearly identical.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Before using Dell PCaaS, the composite financed devices through various vendors with the following assumptions:
Based on these assumptions, the composite pays the following blended costs per device based on user profiles across device class, specification, and region:
Though not calculated for this report, the annual refresh cost for the composite organization if the devices are owned would be $2,497,380.
Risks. This benefit may vary among organizations based on:
The number of devices in an organization.
Whether the organization owns or subscribes to devices.
The average cost per device for an organization (based on procurement method, bulk discounting, etc.).
The length of the refresh cycle for an organization’s devices.
Results. Though variances exist, Forrester did not risk-adjust this benefit because it is matched in the costs section of this report, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $6.2 million.
Average age of Dell PCaaS devices across entire user base
Type Of Device | Devices Deployed | Three-Year Cost |
---|---|---|
Desktops | 800 | $988,800 |
Laptops | 3,200 | $4,284,800 |
Docking stations | 3,200 | $1,137,120 |
Displays | 4,800 | $1,977,600 |
Total (devices and peripherals) | 12,000 (4,000 devices and 8,000 peripherals) | $8,388,320 |
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | Previous (non-Dell PCaaS) hardware cost of all end-user devices | Composite | $5,273,600 | $0 | $0 | |
B2 | Previous hardware cost of all peripherals | Composite | $3,114,720 | $0 | $0 | |
B3 | Total previous hardware costs | B1+B2 | $8,388,320 | $0 | $0 | |
B4 | Average monthly financing costs for end-user devices with Dell PCaaS | Composite | $208,115 | $208,115 | $208,115 | |
Bt | Avoided device acquisition and refresh costs | B4*12 months | $2,497,380 | $2,497,380 | $2,497,380 | |
Risk adjustment | 0% | |||||
Btr | Avoided device acquisition and refresh costs (risk-adjusted) | $2,497,380 | $2,497,380 | $2,497,380 | ||
Three-year total: $7,492,140 | Three-year present value: $6,210,614 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees from organizations using Dell PCaaS and those from organizations not using Dell PCaaS told Forrester that IT talent is in short supply and high demand and that given the business-critical aspect of employee devices, IT resources were assigned to lifecycle management tasks despite the relative tedium. This forced additional hires to complete the other high-impact work for IT. But interviewees said by working with Dell to manage the device lifecycle through PCaaS, many of these IT resources were allocated to staff other IT projects, which saved on additional hires and onboarding costs
An interviewee in manufacturing said that standardizing devices on Dell PCaaS allowed their organization to avoid hiring additional IT technicians despite growing in user and device count by nearly seven times. The same team now supports this user base with less effort than before Dell PCaaS standardization.
The manager of I&O service management in manufacturing noted that Dell PCaaS allowed their organization to avoid FTE effort or hiring across different regions that would have needed a local support presence under past device lifecycle operating models. They explained that this may allow for budget flexibility elsewhere in the IT organization.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Three IT FTEs are reallocated from device lifecycle tasks to other value-adding IT projects. This is a conservative estimate.
The average fully loaded annual salary for an avoided IT FTE hire is $73,000.
Risks. This benefit will vary among organizations based on:
The level and rate of the organization’s IT personnel who work on device lifecycle tasks.
The skill and capacity of the organization’s IT personnel.
The scope and complexity of the organization’s fleet of devices as it relates to the magnitude of IT resource avoidance on Dell PCaaS.
The organization’s need for IT talent as it relates to required hiring.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $654,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | Device support personnel reskilled | Interviews | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
C2 | Rate for an IT personnel hire | Composite | $73,000 | $73,000 | $73,000 | |
Ct | Avoided IT personnel hires through reskilling | C1*C2 | $292,000 | $292,000 | $292,000 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Ctr | Avoided IT personnel hires through reskilling (risk-adjusted) | $262,800 | $262,800 | $262,800 | ||
Three-year total: $788,400 | Three-year present value: $653,545 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees spoke to the impact of device issues or failures that required replacement. In many cases, remote users were without their device for several business days as it was sent off for repair or replacement. Interviewees at organizations with Dell PCaaS said the user productivity benefit of flexible repair or replacement options for devices that experience issues, the value of improved support, and the avoidance of issues altogether through a newer fleet of devices.
The IT group enterprise infrastructure architect in manufacturing noted that before investing with Dell PCaaS, cost constraints for their organization required it to purchase refurbished PCs for users. They said these devices were from different brands and were different models, and that they were an average of three years old. The interviewee said: “Then they would stay in the company for maybe five to seven more years. It didn’t help from a support perspective.”
The interviewee also said the older devices were more prone to issues and therefore led to user downtime. They concluded that with Dell PCaaS, their organization’s users are happier and more productive with their devices.
The same interviewee also provided several examples of Dell PCaaS replacing devices that were damaged due to user error. For instance, they spoke of a sales representative who dropped his device off a boat while vacationing a few days before an important sales meeting. Due to Dell’s global reach, a Dell technician was able to meet the representative at the nearest port with a replacement. The interviewee said, “In the old days, if you were traveling and your PC broke, the solution was to get to the closest store and buy a new PC.”
Interviewees also noted that new functionality from Dell’s 5G and Pro PCs led to productivity enhancements for users. They said employees in the field gained the ability to stay connected much more easily than before and that Dell’s Pro PCs allow users — especially those dealing in AI workloads — to manage more of their work from their own device without relying on outside resources.
Interviewees also cited having the ability to keep users connected more consistently through 5G-connected devices as a productivity enhancement, especially for executives, hybrid workers, and field workers. The SVP of IT and security at the agricultural organization added: “Our executives and sales staff on the move have 5G connectivity no matter where they are and no matter what they’re doing. Our greenhouse workers have connectivity where Wi-Fi can’t reach them since we could never cover all of our space with Wi-Fi. Now, they’re always able to communicate back to the home farm.”
The manager of I&O service management in manufacturing explained that repair or replacements the next business day through Dell ProSupport works well for their organization across different regions, saving users days of downtime when these support issues arise.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Of the organization’s 4,000 devices, 4% experience a critical issue that requires a physical repair or replacement.
Before using Dell PCaaS, an end user with a device issue would go without that device for an average of four business days. This time is reduced by 75% with Dell PCaaS.
Forrester conservatively assumes that an end user operates at 50% effectiveness without their primary device.
The average fully loaded daily rate for an end user is $280.
Risks. This benefit will vary among organizations based on:
The rate at which the organization’s devices experience critical failures.
The organization’s support and/or replacement processes as they relate to the average time to replace a device.
The effectiveness of a user without a primary device.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $159,000.
Average avoided downtime for a user without their primary device
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | Users/devices | A1 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
D2 | Percent of users who experience critical device-related issues | Composite | 4% | 4% | 4% | |
D3 | Business time without device before Dell PCaaS (days) | Interviews | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
D4 | Business time without device with Dell PCaaS (days) | Interviews | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
D5 | Reduced time without device with Dell PCaaS (days) | D3-D4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
D6 | Productivity without device | Assumption | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
D7 | Average daily rate for a user (rounded) | Composite | $280 | $280 | $280 | |
Dt | Avoided user productivity losses due to device access |
D1*D2*D5*D6* D7 |
$67,200 | $67,200 | $67,200 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓5% | |||||
Dtr | Avoided user productivity losses due to device access (risk-adjusted) | $63,840 | $63,840 | $63,840 | ||
Three-year total: $191,520 | Three-year present value: $158,761 |
Evidence and data. Prior to adopting Dell PCaaS, interviewees’ organizations faced many situations that drove shipping costs up, including:
Shipping to and from a central location for provisioning tasks.
Expediting shipping both ways for remote workers with devices experiencing critical issues.
An increasing reliance on shipping as more of the workforce transitioned to hybrid roles.
Interviewees said using Dell ProDeploy gave their organizations the ability to image and provision devices without a central IT location for device provisioning, which reduced at least one shipping instance versus the before state. Having fewer issues requiring repair or replacement resulting from a newer device fleet drove additional savings because the organizations spent less on off-cycle shipping.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
One-third of the organization’s devices ship on-cycle each year as they are refreshed. When a user receives a new device, their old device is retired.
The composite ships 200 devices (5% of the organization’s 4,000 devices) off-cycle as they are repaired or replaced.
The average two-way shipping cost for a device is $110. This includes the cost of expedited shipping for devices shipped off-cycle.
The composite avoids 50% of the per-device shipping cost with Dell PCaaS because fewer devices ship to and from central IT hubs, different offices, or user addresses.
Risks. This benefit will vary among organizations based on:
The organization’s device lifecycle management processes as they relate to the number of times a device ships during its lifecycle.
The average device failure rate as it relates to the costs of repair/replacement and off-cycle shipping.
Any organizational-negotiated shipping terms as it relates to the average shipping rate per device.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $212,000.
Device shipping avoidance with Dell PCaaS
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | Devices | Composite | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
E2 | Devices refreshed (average) | Composite | 1,333 | 1,333 | 1,333 | |
E3 | Devices repaired or replaced via shipping (average) | E1*D2 | 160 | 160 | 160 | |
E4 | Devices shipped | E2+E3 | 1,493 | 1,493 | 1,493 | |
E5 | Average annual two-way shipping cost per device | Composite | $120 | $120 | $120 | |
E6 | Shipping cost avoidance with Dell PCaaS | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Et | Avoided shipping costs | E4*E5*E6 | $89,580 | $89,580 | $89,580 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓5% | |||||
Etr | Avoided shipping costs (risk-adjusted) | $85,120 | $85,120 | $85,120 | ||
Three-year total: $255,303 | Three-year present value: $211,634 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees said that with Dell’s AI PCs with 5G available as a subscription through Dell APEX PCaaS, their organizations saw the benefits of better connectivity across several subsets of their user groups that resulted in better business outcomes.
The SVP of IT and security in agriculture noted there were significant benefits associated with 5G connectivity via Dell devices for their organization’s growers in the field. The interviewee explained that limited connectivity in the field previously resulted in unreported or late-reported signs of crop damage, resulting in suboptimal reactions to these situations. The interviewee noted that by enabling these users with Dell 5G-connected devices, they were able to report these issues as soon as they were discovered, and that more quickly deploying corrective measures improved crop yields and revenue directly attributable to bringing these devices into the field. They attributed a 0.5% annual improvement to crop yields to using Dell 5G devices in the field alone.
The interviewee summarized: “Our growers connected with us in very ad hoc ways. One person would use pen and paper, the next person would make a hotspot off their phone, and the next person would just wait until they got home that night. It really caused us a big challenge in information-gathering. And then more often than I’d like to admit, we just weren’t relaying important information from the field at all because growers didn’t have a connection, didn’t write anything down, or just didn’t want to be late getting home.”
The same interviewee also described the value of using Dell AI PCs for their organization’s grower analysts working on AI modeling to improve operations and outcomes at their farms. They noted that by providing Dell Pro devices to these users, models affecting operations (e.g., crop watering, fertilization, utilities) can be updated on a more frequent basis. The interviewee said this regular iteration leads to better optimization of resources, better crop yields, and more profitability, all without requiring external compute resources: “Our grower analysts can update their models closer to real time. So, instead of us having to reserve server time that has the AI nodes, they can update them on a whim.” Ultimately, these model improvements contributed to better crop yields, less water and fertilizer consumption, and an estimated 10% to 12% reduction in overall energy consumption.
Several interviewees noted that using Dell’s 5G-connected devices allows their organization’s executives and decision-makers to remain better connected while travelling.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Of the organization’s $150,000,000 annual revenue, 3% is influenceable through real-time decisions made with better connectivity.
The composite attributes 15% of the resulting revenue increase to better connectivity.
The composite has a 15% net margin, which is measured in profit.
Risks. This benefit will vary among organizations based on:
The organization’s business as it relates to the potential impact of better connectivity.
The organization’s before state for users’ connected devices as it relates to the potential for improved connectivity.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $239,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | Influenced revenue | Composite | $150,000,000 | $150,000,000 | $150,000,000 | |
F2 | Increase in revenue | Interviews | 3% | 3% | 3% | |
F3 | Affected revenue | F1*F2 | $4,500,000 | $4,500,000 | $4,500,000 | |
F4 | Attribution to better connectivity | Interviews | 15% | 15% | 15% | |
F5 | Revenue increase | F3*F4 | $675,000 | $675,000 | $675,000 | |
F6 | Net margin | Composite | 15% | 15% | 15% | |
Ft | Increased profit from better device connectivity and performance | F5*F6 | $101,250 | $101,250 | $101,250 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓5% | |||||
Ftr | Increased profit from better device connectivity and performance (risk-adjusted) | $96,188 | $96,188 | $96,188 | ||
Three-year total: $288,563 | Three-year present value: $239,204 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees told Forrester that Dell’s Pro and Pro Max devices purchased as a subscription through PCaaS for select subsets of AI developers and power users enabled them to use their own devices to complete some tasks that previously required public cloud consumption resources. Tasks such as AI model development and iterating or updating these models became locally manageable for some users. In addition, some interviewees noted that the ability to manage these tasks locally allowed more frequent model development and iteration, leading to more optimized models and better business results.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
The composite organization’s users who transition to Dell AI PCs (Dell Pro and Pro Max devices) historically spend $5,000 per month on external compute resources to carry out AI-modelling related tasks.
The composite avoids 50% of these costs by deploying Dell AI PCs for these users.
Risks. This benefit will vary among organizations based on:
The amount of resource-intensive AI modeling work that is required of users who will be equipped with Dell Pro and Pro Max devices.
The nature of this work as it relates to the ability to avoid external compute resources and to carry out these tasks locally on Dell devices once deployed.
The number of users who work on AI modeling or resource intensive tasks and the associated number of Dell Pro and Pro Max devices deployed.
Results. To account for these variances, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $67,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1 | Monthly AI cloud consumption costs | Composite | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | |
G2 | Avoidable consumption with Dell AI devices | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Gt | Avoided cloud consumption costs for AI modeling | G1*G2*12 months | $30,000 | $30,000 | $30,000 | |
Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
Gtr | Avoided cloud consumption costs for AI modeling (risk-adjusted) | $27,000 | $27,000 | $27,000 | ||
Three-year total: $81,000 | Three-year present value: $67,145 |
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Improved sustainability. Interviewees noted that Dell PCaaS helps their organizations achieve sustainability benchmarks related to hardware.
Improved security posture. Interviewees said that with the device consistency of Dell PCaaS, there are inherently fewer variables for IT and security operations teams to watch for across device fleets, which improves security postures. They noted that with antivirus and security applications included along with security features at the hardware level, their organizations improved their security postures. The IT group enterprise infrastructure architect explained: “Now that we are standardized on [Dell] devices, we have fewer possibilities of unknown things suddenly showing up because we can test, and because we replace the PC every three years. We don’t have any ancient BIOS (basic input/output system) versions that can easily be hacked. We have Dell SafeBIOS, so we know if the bios has been [tampered] with, [and] the PC is not allowed to connect to our network. We’ve also standardized all of our PCs to a single standard image on every single PC. It’s a huge advantage when we talk about security. It makes life a lot easier because decisions can be based on facts about our devices. We know exactly what’s on our devices and how old they are.”
Budget flexibility. Interviewees from organizations using Dell PCaaS spoke about the benefit of a monthly payment model as opposed to up-front capital expenditures on cash flows. Several said a lack of budget flexibility before adopting Dell PCaaS led their organization to purchase refurbished devices for users and that this would potentially lead to more support issues in subsequent years.
Improved end-user experience. Interviewees said that with Dell PCaaS, users receive their devices faster, receive support resolution an average of three days sooner, operate on hardware that is one to two years newer, and can work with Dell to procure the support or devices they need. They explained that this allows their organizations to enable users with high-end devices refreshed more often with a higher support standard from Dell. And beyond the productivity implications, interviewees also highlighted improvements to user experience through access to better-performing devices that cause fewer issues during their lifespans. This suggests that successful deployment of DaaS offerings such as Dell PCaaS may improve employee onboarding, reduce frustration associated with device breakdowns, and enable additional experience innovations. Furthermore, interviewees said Dell PCaaS allows users to subscribe to the devices that best fit their needs to do their jobs optimally, be it 5G-connected devices for executives or staff on the move or power AI PCs for users whose job responsibilities require more computing power or external computing time via a public cloud.
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Dell AI PCs with 5G and Dell APEX PCaaS and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Improved connectivity. Each interviewee noted their organization plans to expand the number of AI PCs with 5G and said the improved connectivity and functionality will enable end users to be more productive and positively influence the business. The SVP of IT and security at the agriculture organization said, “So far, we’ve been able to enable our users to do AI jobs on the spot, and we will continue to allow them to do that in the future.”
Continuous customization of deployment. As organizations refresh devices leveraging Dell PCaaS, they have the option to choose devices that best match the current working needs of users. Interviewees expressed optimism about their organizations having the ability to evaluate their device choices every few years as opposed to becoming locked into an owned fleet of devices or long-term subscriptions. This may positively affect user effectiveness and therefore business results down the road as working models continue to change.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Htr | Lifecycle service costs | $0 | $848,160 | $848,160 | $848,160 | $2,544,480 | $2,109,248 |
Itr | Subscription of devices through Dell | $0 | $2,424,636 | $2,424,636 | $2,424,636 | $7,273,908 | $6,029,711 |
Jtr | Switching costs | $54,915 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $54,915 | $54,915 |
Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $54,915 | $3,272,796 | $3,272,796 | $3,272,796 | $9,873,303 | $8,193,874 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported their organizations leveraged Dell PCaaS to reduce the burden on IT personnel with respect to the device lifecycle while reducing costs and providing better support to users. Dell provides 24/7 onsite installation, migrates data to the new system while wiping it from the legacy system, and offers 30-day post-deployment support. Dell ProSupport gives organizations priority access to support, damage repair, and proactive monitoring for automatic issue prevention and resolution. Organizations pay for Dell ProDeploy and ProSupport on a per-user per-month basis of the term of the device lease/refresh cycle.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
The composite leverages the full scope of Dell’s PCaaS.
The organization adheres to a 36-month device refresh cycle.
The composite’s average monthly PC service and support cost per user is $17.73. This estimate is based on information from Dell and complemented by Forrester-sourced calculations regarding tasks the organization will still need internal resources to carry out (e.g., managing the initial Dell procurement process, creating and managing a central image system, or conducting systems management).
Because IT personnel previously completed all tasks for the composite, the organization saves more than 6 FTE hours per device during the three-year device cycle.
Lifecycle service | Without Dell PCaaS (FTE time only) | Dell PCaaS (Dell fees and FTE time) |
---|---|---|
Procurement | $2.98 | $2.09 |
Imaging services | $2.27 | $1.62 |
Physical installation and basic setup | $0.94 | $1.80 |
Final preparation and migration | $1.25 | $1.13 |
Systems management | $8.68 | $8.16 |
Support | $10.11 | $2.41 |
Asset retirement/disposal | $0.94 | $0.46 |
Total | $27.17 | $17.67 |
Risks. This cost will vary among organizations based on:
The number of devices.
Factors that influence the cost per Dell PCaaS offering (e.g., device type, service SLAs).
The skill and capacity of the organization’s IT personnel to manage device lifecycle tasks outside the scope of Dell PCaaS capabilities.
Results. Because Dell provided the monthly per-user cost estimate for the composite organization, Forrester did not adjust this cost for risk, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.1 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Users | Composite | 0 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
H2 | Monthly Dell PCaaS cost per user | Dell | $0 | $17.67 | $17.67 | $17.67 | |
Ht | Lifecycle service costs | H1*H2*12 months | $0 | $848,160 | $848,160 | $848,160 | |
Risk adjustment | 0% | ||||||
Htr | Lifecycle service costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $848,160 | $848,160 | $848,160 | ||
Three-year total: $2,544,480 | Three-year present value: $2,109,248 |
Evidence and data. Most of the interviewees said their organization multisourced devices from several device vendors or resellers and that this required vendor relationships with several different organizations and often limited the scope of bulk discounting. Interviewees estimated the average prices for Dell-subscribed devices were roughly 3% lower than the average per-device spend for the incumbent devices, and some reported per-device spending that was more than 3% of the Dell subscription price for comparable hardware. Some said the requirement for more powerful hardware for more complex workloads is increasing at their organization and noted there is additional demand to source more powerful devices for some users, which can result in significant one-time costs.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
The composite organization leases devices from Dell that are similar in specification to pre-Dell device acquisitions and refreshes. As part of the PCaaS program, the organization also refreshes lower-specification devices to Dell’s AI PC or 5G-connected offerings for users who require additional connectivity, power, and/or functionality. Including end-user devices and peripherals, this costs the composite $2.4 million annually.
The specific breakdown of devices for the composite organization is dictated by the user-persona breakdown (see below). A blended rate for each device across all device configurations (from AI PCs with 5G including annual fees to base model devices) is used to estimate costs for the composite organization based on the device type breakdown.
The composite organization subscribes to devices through Dell on a three-year device refresh cycle.
Forrester conservatively assumes the composite pays 3% less for Dell-subscribed devices than for incumbent devices.
Type Of Device | Devices Deployed | Three-Year Cost |
---|---|---|
Desktops | 800 | $960,000 |
Laptops | 3,200 | $4,160,000 |
Docking stations | 3,200 | $1,104,000 |
Displays | 4,800 | $1,920,000 |
Total (devices and peripherals) | 12,000 (4,000 devices and 8,000 peripherals) | $8,144,000 |
Risks. These costs may vary among organizations based on:
The number and types of devices the organization subscribes to or purchases through Dell.
The length of the contract/refresh cycle and discounting specifics.
Results. Because Dell provided the pricing for the composite organization, Forrester did not adjust this cost for risk, yielding a three-year total PV (discounted at 10%) of $6 million.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I1 | Total costs for end-user devices | Dell | $0 | $5,120,000 | $0 | $0 | |
I2 | Total costs for peripherals | Dell | $0 | $3,024,000 | $0 | $0 | |
I3 | Total hardware costs | I1+I2 | $0 | $8,144,000 | $0 | $0 | |
I4 | Average monthly device costs for end-user devices with Dell PCaaS | Composite | $0 | $202,053 | $202,053 | $202,053 | |
It | Subscription of devices through Dell | I4*12 | $0 | $2,424,636 | $2,424,636 | $2,424,636 | |
Risk adjustment | 0% | ||||||
Itr | Subscription of devices through Dell | $0 | $2,424,636 | $2,424,636 | $2,424,636 | ||
Three-year total: $7,273,908 | Three-year present value: $6,029,711 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees said switching B2B providers was rarely cost-neutral because their organizations needed to create new processes and build new relationships. They also indicated IT staff needed to invest time to maximize the effectiveness of the Dell PCaaS tools within their organizations. In addition, companies may need to continue contracts with incumbent device and/or support providers in the short term to medium term before completely discontinuing service.
Modeling and assumptions. Forrester assumes the composite organization pays a one-time switching cost of $52,300. This does not include any costs of learning to deploy, manage, or administer a new operating system or business application that might be rolled out at the same time as the new devices.
Risks. This cost may vary among organizations based on:
Contracts currently in place for devices and/or support.
The organization’s device refresh cycles as they relate to the cadence of a potential Dell PCaaS rollout.
Results. To account for these variances, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $55,000.
Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J1 | Devices | Composite | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
J2 | Switching provider costs | Composite | $52,300 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Jt | Switching costs | J2 | $52,300 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Risk adjustment | ↑5% | ||||||
Jtr | Switching costs (risk-adjusted) | $54,915 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Three-year total: $54,915 | Three-year present value: $54,915 |
Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | ($54,915) | ($3,272,796) | ($3,272,796) | ($3,272,796) | ($9,873,303) | ($8,193,874) |
Total benefits | $0 | $4,271,261 | $4,271,261 | $4,271,261 | $12,813,782 | $10,621,993 |
Net benefits | ($54,915) | $998,465 | $998,465 | $998,465 | $2,940,479 | $2,428,119 |
ROI | 30% | |||||
Payback | <6 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in AI PCs with 5G and APEX PCaaS.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Dell AI PCs with 5G and APEX PCaaS can have on an organization.
Interviewed Dell stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Dell AI PCs with 5G and APEX PCaaS.
Interviewed four people at organizations using Dell AI PCs with 5G and APEX PCaaS to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks. Interviewed four people at organizations that manage their device lifecycles in-house to provide additional data.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
1 Source: Forrester’s Digital Workspace And Employee Technology Survey, 2024.
2 Source: Enhance Digital Employee Experience With Device-As-A-Service (DaaS), Forrester Research, Inc., January 23, 2020.
3 Source: Forrester’s Digital Workspace And Employee Technology Survey, 2024.
4 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
5 Source: Forrester’s Digital Workspace And Employee Technology Survey, 2024.
6 Source: The State Of Private 5G, 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., April 22, 2025.
7 Source: End-User Computing Market Insights, 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., January 28, 2025.
8 Ibid.
9 Source: The State Of Edge Intelligence, 2024: Part One, Forrester Research, Inc., April 10, 2024.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Dell and Verizon Business and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Dell AI PCs with 5G and APEX PCaaS. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Dell AI PCs with 5G and APEX PCaaS based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse <Client> or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Dell, Verizon Business, and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester, Dell, and Verizon Business make no warranties of any kind.
Dell Technologies and Verizon Business reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Dell Technologies provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Richard Cavallaro
May 2025
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html